Lower Suwonhiri dam under construction
by Chandan Kumar Duarah
At least 14,000 people of 300 villages were affected as the 100-metre stretch of the state of the art Matmora embankment was washed away by the gushing water of the Brahamaputra. The geo-tube embankment constructed at the cost of Rs 140 crore using geo-fabric technology by the Malayasian firm Sues Kira on a 5 Km long strech could be completed on time. The swelling water of the mighty Brahamaputra entered through the 1,500 metre long incomplete stretch submerging 300 villages under Matmora, Dangdhara, Dimoruguri, Kekuri, Kherkotia, Banna and East Dhakuakhana goan panchyats. Matmora was the third casualty this monsoonal season.While Matmora dominated the proceedings of the budget session of the Assam Assambly furore was created in the House over the issue of the spree in construction of big dams in adjoining Arunachal Pradesh.In Assam at least 12 people were killed and hundreds of villages were inundated and over ten thousand people displaced in mudslides and flash floods triggered by water from Arunachal Pradesh last October. Flood or flash flood– the routine phenomena of flood in Assam has reached a more aggravating level killing more people, destroying more homes, roads, bridges, embankments, cattle and crops plunging the state in more debt.The intensity of flood in both states of Assam and Arunchal Pradesh has the alarm bell riniging. Flash flood in the Rupa subdivision of West Kameng district in western Arunachal Pradesh washed away 100 metres of the vital Bomdila-Tawang road on October 28, 2008. It is beleived that heavy rain due to climate change and glacial lake outburst cause flash flood in Arunachal Pradesh. This scenario has been aggravated with the sudden release of water from dams in the hydroelectric projects. At least 22 people were killed by flash flood in Assam in 2004.It may be a coctail of climate change (a parched Assam waiting for the blessings of the rain God), mega dam projects of Arunachal and Matmora in Assam Assembly but time is really ticking away for Assam sitting on the ‘Water bomb’ created by Arunachal Pradesh.The dams in Arunachal has createred the entire Brahamaputra valley civilization. National Hydroelectric Power Corporation’s (NHPC) 3,000 MW Dihang Hydropower Project’s (DHP) foundation stone was laid by Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh in Januray 2008, in face of huge protests from leaders even before receiving an environment impact clearness (EIC) certificate. The project which is due to be completed in nine years will displace a significant number of people in the State. Incidently, NHPC and even NEEPCO have eIucited that big dams get the nod even without proper investigation/survey of downstream impact.The repeated water of flash floods in Upper Assam triggered by sudden release of water from a hydropower dam in Upper Arunachal Pradesh has displaced thousands in Lakhimpur. Vast areas of cultivable land has become barren forcing people to leave their homes seeking other means of livelihood. About 33,000 hectare of cultivable land in 19 districts of Assam has become barren.While the repeated wave of this man-made disaster has played havoc in the socio-economic and environmental fabric of the Brahamaputra valley attributing of the antidam movement in Assam and Arunachal Pradesh went on in a signing spree of MOUs. The Arunachal government has signed 103 MOUs and another 30 are on the anvil. Without taking into consideration of downstream effect.The mega dam projects when commissioned will generate 70000 MW of which Arunachal will have the state of 12% as ‘bonus’. Arunachal government’s desire to earn ‘hydro dollars’ at the expense of Assam has brought numerous players into the field. A steady market in the east Asian countries like Vietman, Laos has big guns like Reliance Power to a lesser known Mountain Fall India on this toes.With 104 projects the Arunachal Pradesh government expects to generate one-third of India’s hydropower estimating its income at Rs 8,000 crore through the sale of its share of electricity. For the Assam government, Arunachal’s mega dams were a successful, lets say a fairy tale story, till it was blown off its feet by the disaster of Lakhimpur and Dhemaji on the lines of the disaster classic ‘Day After Tomorrow?’.It way be recalled that in 2005-06 five mega projects of the state were lapped by private firms Siyom (1,000 MW) and Tato II (700 MW) went to Reliance Energy, Hirong (500 MW) and Lower Siang (1,600 MW) to Jaypee Associates and 1,000 MW Naying bagged by DS construction. Next Bhilwara Energy, Mountain Fall, KSK Electricity Financing and GMR Energy entered the scene with nine agreements signed with a total generation target of 4,425 MV. Thirty eithty more agreements were signed by February 2008 which mounts the total private developers to 52 with combined installed capacity of 14,289.5 MW. Besides these projects, another seven projects have been awarded to public sector units like NHPC, National Thernal Power Corporation (NTPC) and the North Eeastern Electric Power Corporation (NEEPCO). Apart from these most of the private companies which were allocated projects do not have experience in building such projects or dams. The companies wishing to invest in hydropower in the state need not have any experience in building such projects. There were no specific guidlines for determining the bidder’s technical strength or experience in building dams. There is no criteria and methodology for selecting power developers. There is no tranferency too. A glance at a notice inviting bids for three hydroelectric projects by the state government on September 25, 2007, raved that companies wishing to invest in hydropower in the state need not have any experience in building such projects. The only tech-economic requirement the government sought for constructing the mega Dibang II, Kalai I and Bharali II projects was that the ‘bidders should have a strong financial and technical base and adequate free reserves and surpluses and requisite technical capabilily’. Threre were no specific guidlines for determining the bidder’s technical strength on experience in building dams. Above all the safty concerns were also overlooked by both the state government and private players. There is no clause in the agreement fixing responsibility for the damage caused by dam break in case of earthquake on landslide whereas Arunachal Pradesh falls in high seismic zone and is landslide prone. Most bid by private proporents do not go through any scrutiny and the projects are awarded on the basis of the upfront payment and the free electricity they promise to supply to the state. For the 1000 MW Siyom project, Reliance Power paid a processing free of Rs. 1 crore and an upfront Rs. 2.1 crore. Reliance, DS Construction and Jaypee Associates for example promise 12 percent free electricity for 10 years and 15 percent thereafter, much more then public enterprises. Arunachal Pradesh Government says that it needs money from hydroelectric projects for building physical and social infrastructure in the state. A project like Dibang Multipurpose Project(DMP) can provide the state exchequer Rs 300 crore annually or 15 percent of the state’s annual revenue. Political leaders claim that the projects will also be beneficial to the people of the state directly. But the safty measures and envirornmental impact issues draw less attention. DMPs environment impact assessment (EIA) report itself says that due to high seismicity in the region the reservior should not be filled to its capacity for the first few years. So it is questioned by some environment activists that how they will generate the peak power. No one of these project developers taken into consideration the impact of melting of glaciers in Himalayas and silting of resevoirs. According to geologist Arup Saikia high discharge of silt could affect the power productions of some dams. According to a assesment by ‘Down to Earth’ the environmental journal, the DMP reservior will also submerge over 5,000 hectares of forest and NHPC will have to acquire community forest land for compensatory afforestation, which means more displacement and resource alienation. With 17 projects planned on the Dibang, communities in the region could end up losing most of their land. Moreover, diversion of water from the Rangarnadi to the Dikong for the projects not only affecting the downstream people of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh but also changing the nature of the rivers. A thousand are affected by unsystematic mangement of the river. Nearly 20 hactare of land has become uncultivable due to lack of water. Since Arunachal Pradesh is is a high seismic zone and silt load in its rivers is also high, Dulal Goswami, the former head of Department of Environmental Sciences, Gauhati University says tha the lower Himalayas are young and geotectonic activity is still very strong in the region. They are also prone to landslides and geological upheavals, here any development activity warrants careful and studied interventions. Neeraj Vagholikar of Kalpaviriksh ,a NGO, says that there has been no basin-wise study to gause either the ecological, social and technical difficulties or rivers carrying capacity. In January and February 2008, the Expert Appraisal Committee on River Valley and Hydroelectric Projects of the Environment ministry ordered basin studies on the Kameng and Lohit rivers. But there is a clause in the order that individual project clearances will not be subject to these basin-level studies. According to conservator of forest of Arunachal Pradesh R Kemp the government had done no study to assess the overall impact of the dams is the state. NHPC has refused any compensation to people in case of a dams break . Arunachal Pradesh is considered to have a potential of more than 50,000 MW. The state government estimates that mega hydropower projects planned in the state can augment its annual income by up to Rs 8,000 crore though the sale of its share electricity whereas the 2008 state budget of the state was Rs 2,065 crore. The state government of Arunachal Pradesh has been exposing its enthusiasm to exploit the potential given by nature and natually this has attracted major hydropower players like NHPC, Reliance power , Jaiprakash Associates and DS Constructions to the state to tap the existing opportunities. All these big players made a bee line to Arunachal to have a market in Southeast Asian countries like Vietnam, Laos, Myanmer, Thailand with the power generated from these projects. Arunachal Government has signed MOUs with NHPC, NTPC and NEEPCO in 2006 to generate 15,000 MW of electricity at an investment of Rs 41,457 crore. With NHPC and the state government had signed three agreements. Other than the 3,000 MW Dihang project, NHPC is also working on Rs. 3,172 crore Tawang I project with an installed capacity of 750 MW and Rs. 3,008 crore Tawang II project with an installed capacity of 750 MW as well.The government has signed MOUs with private companies against the wishes of NHPC, regotiating higher quota of free power from these players for the state. This has become possible mainly because the private players were given these projects without any bidding or purchase power agreement.Reliance Power, an energy generation firm in the Anil Ambani Group has signed pacts with the Arunachal Pradesh government for four hydro-electric power projects in state with a combined capacity of 2520 MW. According to a senior offical in the company won the projects as Kalai II with 1,200 MW, Emini with 500 MW, Amulia with 420 MW and Midhundon with 400 MW. Among them the Kalai project will come Up in the Anlin River bain with the others will be set up in Dibang Valley.Reliance Power’s earlier hydro projects are the Tato-II with 700 MW in Dibang and Siyom 1,000 MW project on the river by the same name. All projects are planned to be commissioned within the 12th five year plan (2012-2017).NHPC has been working to in Arunachal Pradesh to increase its capacity to 5175 MW, while Reliance Power’s is awarded of projects with total hydropwer project portfolio to 4,620 MW. A Reliance Power official said that it usually takes 10–12 years to develop hydroprojects, but they have targeted completion in six-seven years. According to a government source that most bids by private proponents do not go through any scrutiny and the projects are awarded on the basis of upfront paymant and the free electricity they promise to the state. Reliance Power, DS Construction and Jaypee Associates, for example promise 12 percent free electricity for 10 years and 15 percent thereafter, much more than public enterprise.The Central Electricity Authority, the section’s regulatory with only has estimated the potential 39 big hydroelectric projects in Arunachal Pradesh at 49,126 MW, while smaller ones are expected to generate another 1,600 MW. In last year the North-east Regional Power Minister’s Committee had expressed concern over the threat posed to the environment and human habitats in catchment as well as downstream areas because of setting up of several mega dams in Arunachal Pradesh hills and other bordering states of Assam. The Committee had requested the central Government to carry out a study on comulative impact of these dams in catchment areas. But the Government of Arunachal Pradesh has registered its opposition to what the Government of Assam has stated against construction of mega dams. But the stand of present power minister of Assam, Pradyut Bordoloi is not firm. Unfortunately he is not against the participation of private players in Arunachal Pradesh going to build mega dams without proper measures. The hydropower potential map prepeared by Arunachal Government projects generation of 56,539 MW of power completly ignoring the massive threat posed to the densely populated areas downstream mostly in Assam. It is said that the 3,000 MW Dibang project is proposed as a hydropower cum flood moderation scheme and involves the construction of a 288 m or high dam. But the mega size of this dam can be gauged from the fact that the Lower Subansiri project which is also a mega project involves a dam which is 116 m. high while Dibang will be 288 m high. This multipurpose project is proposed to be developed as a joint venture between NHPC the Government of Arunachal Pradesh. Though the cumulative affects of the dam in catchment areas in Assam is indispensable, no environmental public hearing was held in Assam. It is noteworthy that soon after the public hearing project authorities had submitted its documents to Ministry of Environment and forests it got the grant of environmental clearance. The environmental clearance granted to the 1,000 MW Middle Siang (Siyom) project was challenged before National Environment Appellate Authority (NEAA)– a special environment court by Rabindranath of Akajan, Dhemaji district. The grounds were extermely valid on downstream-impacts. But NHPC argued in court that people staying downstream in Assam cannot be aggrieved by an upstream project in Arunachal Pradesh. On the otherhand the Detailed Project Report (DPR) of the project contradicts this stand. In that report NHPC mentioned that part of the project cost related to ‘flood caution’ should be taken by Government of Assam as it will be beneficiary state. According to NHPC this will also help reduce cost of electricity. Disregarding the downstream social and environmental issuses the NHPC and the Arunachal Government are arguing that downstream people as well as Assam can not legally challenge environmental cleareances granted to dams in Arunachal Pradesh .So as complying with the NHPC, the National Environmental Appallate Authority had agreed with this stand and rejected the application by Rabindranath, the pretitioner for Assam. On the other hand the Ministry of Environment & forests (MOE) has finalised ‘Terms of Refernce’ (TOR) for conducting the environment impact assesment (EIA) reports for-five Tawang I (750 MW), Tawang II (1,750 MW), Tato II (700 MW), Etalim (4000 MW) and Atunli (500 MW) propossed hydroelectric projects in Arunachal Pradesh. It is noteworthy that the TORs for all the five projects mentioned specifically ask studies to be restricted a 10 km radius. But a 10 km radius study can’t cover the hundred or more kilometer long downstream upto Assam. Arunachal Pradesh has the river system flowing swiftly out of the Himalayas. They flow towards Assam in the south and join the Brahamaputra. The Brahamaputra than flows in to the Bay of Bangal though Bangladesh. There appears to contradiction between the Government of Arunachal Pradesh signing so many MOUs on the hand and yet admitting to the serious impacts of these projects on the other. But there is no contradiction about the fact that all these projects will have considerable downstream impacts.According to Bittu Sahgal, editor, Sanctury megazine, Assam’s agriculture, fisheries, ability to cope with floods and droughts is totally at risk from these dams. He says at a cost of 6 crores per megawatt, the Planning Commission believes that 50,000 mw of hydropower can be generated (Rs.3,00,000 crores) over the next decade or so. But most of these projects are located in the Himalayas where glacial melt is so rapid that by the time to projects are built, the turbines will have next to to glacial melt available to turn turbines. According to a paper by DC Goswami and P J Das of Department of environmental science, Gauhati University the peak demand of power of NE region at the end of the Ninth Plan was 1809 MW. The planned addition to hydropower generation in NE is 19,098 MW by 2020. This is more than three times the projected peak demand of power in 2020 (5700 MW). So it is alleged that the apparent benefit of the proposed projects is not meant for the region but more for the market in India and abroad. Recently the world has recognised the North-east India as a biodiversity hot spot. This is the region of the world that combines highest rainfall, highest river chain, highest number of tribes and large number of species. Obviously the engineering solutions to build dams and reservoirs here must be based on parameters, premises and priorities that account for the stupendous sediment loads, preciptation levels and looming dangers like glacial retreat, glacial lake outburst and seismic activity. The rainforests of the eastern Himalayas including North-east India part of the Indo-Myanmar biodiversity hotspot, one of 25 such hotspots in the world, and more to two endemic bird areas (EBAs) indentified by Birdlife International. The proposed dams across the Brahmaputra and its tributaries will submerge vast tracts of pristine forests. Parts of these include crucial wild habitates such as Dihang-Debang Biosphere Reserve, Namdapha Biosphere Reserve, Pakhui Wildlifes Sanctuary and Tale Valley Wildlife Sanctuary in Arunachal Pradesh and Nameri National Park and Dibru Saikhowa National Park in Assam. Regulations of the river flow and the changed patterns of erosion and siltation cause ecological havoc downstream.Rivers are principal source of beach sands, estuary silt and mud flats which provide nutrients for estuary and coastal fisharies.Dams would block the flow of the vital materials, depriving fisheries of nutrients causing shoreline erosion and loss of wetlends.From an aquatic conservation point of view the survival of the endangered river dolphin (hihu), golden mahsheer and other aquatic species will be under threat. Moreover changes in the river flows will be a detriment to the common people who depend upon riverine and beel (wet lands) fisheries, and ‘deep water rice cultivation’ (hali kheti). There are huge risks (social, ecological, engiereeing) that are not factored into the projected benefits. While there is nodoubt about the need of develop, the Northeast region, what is required is sustainable development that is tailored for and encompasses. Social ,cultural and environmental factors unique to this region.The dam building institutions like NEEPCO, NHPC, WAPCOS, NTPC and Ministry of water, power and environment and forest are involved in agressive decision making without actually involving the scientists, environmentalists and activists of the region. According to International Rivers Network, the NHPC which will be implementing the largest numbers of schemes in the north-east India has a poor track record in project implementiation. It has been repetedly convicted for violating state and central laws, national project clearance processes and legal regulatory requirements.Five core values (equity, efficiency, participatony decision making, sustainability and accountability) and the seven strategic priorities highlighted by the World Commission on Dams report during project assesment, planning and implenentation.There is no denying the power needs of the country must be met. The glacial retreating and glacial lakes outburst floods turns the problem of dams to a grave devastation.So the most valuable question is whether building big dams across Himalayan rivers is the best solution of power? Saigal says – ‘I am also worried about the impact of the Forest Right Act on the inter-tribe equilibrium the Northeast where traditions are fast falling to short term development options being excercised by planners and politicians.In a letter to the journalists of Northeast inclined to nature conservation Sahgal writes ‘You see how solar thermal works at Balipara. That coupled with a series of micro-mini hydel projects for power coupled with hydrums that can lift swift flowing river water can meet needs of almost every village in the Northeast. Why should your forests be sacrificed to allow Delhi politicians (in search of power and power) to make a killing (literally and figuaratively) at the cost of the Northeast? … Are the people of the North-east even minimally aware of the danger to which they are being put?'(The writer is a science writer , researcher and former Robert Bosch Fellow.This report first published in “The Independent” in 2009 )